Most agencies have spent years investing in data technology, and most agency leaders sense that something in the foundation is not quite right. What is harder is naming it: which gaps are quietly limiting every program that depends on data, and where the highest-leverage improvements would be.
This assessment gives senior leaders a clear, honest view of where their agency stands across the six dimensions that consistently determine whether data modernization delivers lasting value, and where to focus next.
Each dimension represents an area where organizations consistently get stuck, and where getting things right early makes everything that follows easier. Together they form a foundation: strategy sets direction, governance creates accountability, infrastructure makes governance enforceable, operations keeps the data trustworthy, security protects what has been built, and culture determines whether any of it changes how the organization actually works.
Whether your agency has a clear, executive-sponsored vision for what data should do for the mission, and whether you are executing against it.
Whether data authority is clearly defined and enforced in practice, not just documented in policy
Whether people across the organization use data to guide decisions, supported by data they actually trust.
Whether your systems support a modern, integrated, agency-owned data foundation that can evolve.
Whether your data stays accurate and consistent over time, or requires constant manual reconciliation.
Whether sensitive data is protected at the data level and audit evidence is generated continuously, not in cycles.
The model evaluates each dimension across three maturity levels.
Few agencies are at the same level across all six, and not every agency needs to be. What matters is that the dimensions you have invested in are working together.
A profile showing where you are strong, where you are not, and where the difference matters most. And not a single averaged score that hides where the real gaps are.
Plain-language guidance describing what your profile means in practice and where misalignment between dimensions may be limiting investments you have made.
Specific guidance on where to focus first, based on your profile rather than a generic best-practice roadmap.
Results you can share with your leadership team to align on priorities, build the investment case, and decide where to begin.
For a deeper treatment of the model, including the underlying argument and what good looks like across each dimension:
Answer each question based on your organization's current reality, not its aspirations or what is documented in policy. The results are a practical starting point for understanding where to focus next, not a comprehensive audit.
Absent: Not in place
Informal: In place in limited or informal ways
Defined: Partially defined and applied to some priority areas
Enforced: Well defined and consistently applied in many areas
Optimized: Fully operationalized, enforced, and continuously improved
If a rating feels between two levels, pick the one that better describes most of your organization most of the time. The assessment is most valuable when shared with the people in your agency who see different parts of the data foundation.
Most leaders complete the assessment in about 30 minutes.